…but he isn’t stealing your tv. At least not this time.
Andy G and I won’t be missing this.
(h/t Michael Rand, RandBall)
…but he isn’t stealing your tv. At least not this time.
Andy G and I won’t be missing this.
(h/t Michael Rand, RandBall)
Filed under Timberwolves
So, I just discovered Wolves Rubes, a new Timberwolves site that already has some interesting content up, like this post breaking down Pau Gasol trade rumors.
Check them out over at http://wolvesrubes.blogspot.com/
Filed under Timberwolves
Tonight’s matchup with Philly turned into an interesting contest. It was interesting because a near-capacity crowd showed up on a Sunday night even though the Sixers don’t have a “superstar” talent that typically draws big attendance. It was interesting because it was very close for nearly the entire game. It was interesting because Jrue Holiday and Ricky Rubio are each fascinating players in different ways. And it was interesting because the Wolves won by a single point, in somewhat bizarre fashion.
Filed under Timberwolves
This blogger says no.
I decided to rank the dunkers, based on how well I expect them to do in the contest (that is, NOT on their in-game dunking ability). My list is below the fold.
Filed under Timberwolves
Andy G: We wrote some about the awesome 2008 Draft class, yesterday. With Michael Beasley losing minutes to Wesley Johnson, and AR15 racking up DNP-CD’s the way J.J. Barea racks up wild turnovers, is it possible that these restricted free agents are being frozen out of bigger pay days?
I mean, there’s more-than-plausible deniability here; each guy has his own weaknesses and hardly COMMANDS big minutes. Beasley gets lost on defense and scores inefficiently more often than not, and AR15 has bouts of losing all control of his emotions and play. But Mike provides needed shot creation and AR15 racks up production in short minutes at reasonable efficiency… next summer, they’ll be taking their talents around the league, looking for long-term contracts. Might it be that Adelman or (more likely) KAHN are scheming to limit those contracts, perhaps planning to re-sign at least one of them at a bargain bin rate?
Patrick J: I like where you’re going with this, but I’ll disagree anyway. These guys are pretty much the basketball equivalent of that hot girl you always see at the bar whenever you go out for a drink: lots of potential on the outside, but deep down you know she wouldn’t be there if she weren’t deeply flawed on the inside. Randolph’s problems show up less in the stats than on the court. He just can’t control his body or emotions. (Sort of like that girl.) Beasley’s unfocused disengagement gets more troubling by the game. Both look like reconcilables, but they’d need the right situation, coaching, teammates, role, etc, and I think we’ll be lucky if either turns it around here. So I’ll give Adelman and Kahn the benefit of the doubt on this one–you know they want to exploit that talent more than anyone.
AG: Okay, I like the analogy, and you are probably right. How about tihs: Let’s assume that ONE of these two guys is getting the Isaiah Thomas Freeze-Out from some combination of Kahn, various Adelmans, and (just for fun) Rob Moor.
Which guy do you think the team would intentionally withhold an opportunity to, in hopes of retaining him at a discount?
PJ: I guess if we think through the implications of the theory, the answer would be Randolph–the reason being that he appears to be permanently benched DESPITE putting up solid numbers and being on the floor during many of the team’s better early-season runs, which often came during 2nd-half comebacks. In contrast, Beasley keeps getting fairly consistent, if limited, minutes. It’s weird to think about this since Randolph doesn’t seem like he’d be that expensive regardless, but he’s got the raw athleticism, length, and basketball IQ of DeAndre Jordan, and Jordan got paid (relatively speaking) after just one decent season, so it isn’t inconceivable that the same could happen to Randolph if he got enough showcase this year.
AG: I would also bet on Randolph, if forced to choose. I’ve been kicking around Derrick Williams trade ideas like it’s my job (even though I still like D-Thrill as a budding power forward prospect) and I’d guess R.J. Adelman spends much of his day doing the same. If the team can get wing value for D-Thrill (like Mayo, or Redick, or Kevin Martin, or Monta Ellis, or…) then all of a sudden AR15 means more to the team as a long-term backup big man. By freezing him out of minutes this year, they’re positioning themselves to be able to match what promises to be a reasonable offer, if he gets one. Problem is, he might just take his qualifying offer (if we extend it) and wait for UFA status. Hard to say, but I enjoy NBA conspiracy theories.
PJ: Here’s a question regarding another ’08er: Would you trade Derrick Williams for O.J. Mayo? Would Kahn? Would Chris Wallace?? With Z-Bo out, Memphis needs a PF and the Wolves need a SG, so the basic logic seems sound. But it hurts my brain to try to work through Kahn’s and Wallace’s potential thought processes. Who says no?
AG: D-Thrill for O.J.? I’m not sure that either team does it. Williams isn’t good enough (yet) to be relied upon by a team that hopes to contend for a championship. O.J. isn’t good enough for the Wolves to trade the most-recent #2 pick in the draft for. The trade would have to be adjusted somehow in our favor. Anyway, that’s probably enough speculation about the ’08ers for now. Until next time.
Filed under Timberwolves
Filed under Timberwolves
Having played 28 games (13-15) our Wolves are now exactly 42.42424242… percent complete with this shortened regular season. What better time to visit the Basketball Reference team page and see where we’re at with numbers?
The first (and second and third and fourth…) thing that jumps out is Kevin Love. Without even checking, I’m sure that his 25.6 points per game is a franchise record, if continued for the rest of the season. To pair that with 13.8 rebounds per game is pretty amazing. When compared to the best scorer-rebounder power forwards of the past (as these numbers require) the one statistic that seems lacking is the assists per game (1.7). Last year, Love had a career-high 2.5 apg, which still isn’t all that high, compared to other power forwards who generate so many points and rebounds with consistency. Charles Barkley and Kevin Garnett were usually over 4 assists per game, and Blake Griffin currently assists over 3 times a night, despite playing with Chris Paul who would seemingly handle the creating for the Clips. Love’s assist-to-turnover ratio of 0.63/1.00 (1.7 to 2.7) is one area for him to improve on. Should he focus on getting more assists, or fewer turnovers? I think that’s a fair question. Some of his high-turnover games (like Friday’s versus Dallas) coincide with ugly Wolves offense, geared away from Rubio passing and Pekovic/Beasley post ups and more toward Love trying to draw fouls that aren’t there. But this is a small point in the grand scheme of the great year he is having. Based on season performance to date, Love was deserving of a starting spot on the All-Star Team.
Scanning down the roster, the low shooting percentages stick out. Seven players are currently shooting under 40 percent from the field. Two of those players (Rubio & Johnson) are starters. The team is shooting 42.9 percent, good for 24th in the NBA. If Pekovic and his whopping 63 percent are removed from the equation, the rest of the team shoots 41.6 percent, which would be good for 28th in the league. Speaking of Pek, should he be getting the ball more? The natural response is “obviously” except that the way he gets those buckets at high efficiency is not an easy scenario to create. He seals his man directly under the basket, commencing the three-second timer that has been his offensive kryptonite in the early part of his career. With such a wide lane, the opportunities to find Pek in his money zone are not as easy as it sounds. Still, the team should look as much as possible to exploit what is becoming a matchup problem for opponents, with Pek’s interior scoring.
Staying with Pek for a moment, check out his per-36 numbers (18.3 points, 10.5 rebounds) and consider that he could become an All-Star center with enough playing time. Crazy, huh? The obvious area for improvement is turnovers. Pek turns it over 3.5 times per 36, despite only dishing out 0.5 assists in that same time. An assist-to-turnover ratio of 1 to 7 is horrendous. He’s improved greatly from last season at limiting the 3 seconds calls, and offensive fouls, but both remain big areas for learning and adjusting to NBA rules.
As far as regressing to the mean goes, Michael Beasley and Ricky Rubio seem to be doing exactly that, in opposite directions. Much was made about Rubio’s imroved shooting when he started the year hot. That has changed for the worse, as he is currently hitting 37.1 percent of field goals, and 31.7 percent of 3′s. Apparently he’s working hard with Terry Porter and Shawn Respert on his jumper. I don’t doubt that, but for now I’d rather see him limit the jumper attempts in games. Beasley was shooting under 40 percent before his foot injury. That has climbed up to 42.7, and will probably continue to rise some at least into the mid-40′s. His three-point shooting is hot right now, hitting 45.7 percent from downtown. He would be wise to do as he did on Friday versus Dallas, and set up shop in that corner. Ricky will find him there plenty.
What numbers stick out to you? What do you expect to change?
Filed under Uncategorized